Introduction to Cosmology Example Exam Question: Answer

Lecture 12: Distances at z ~ 1

Define the terms proper distance, luminosity distance and angular diameter distance. [1.5]
Proper distance: distance obtained by integrating the Robertson-Walker metric with dt = 0 (i.e. distance at some specific time t; the comoving proper distance is the proper distance evaluated at a=1). You could also quote the formula dP = ∫dt/a evaluated from the time of emission of the light being observed, te, to the time of observation, to. [0.5]
Luminosity distance: distance obtained by comparing the observed flux (or apparent magnitude) with the emitted luminosity (or absolute magnitude): f = L/(4πdL2) or m – M = 5 log(dL/10). [0.5]
Anguiar size distance: distance obtained by comparing the angle subtended by the object to its linear dimensions: θ = D/dA where D is the linear diameter of the object and θ is its angular diameter. [0.5]
Show that the angular diameter distance dA and the luminosity distance dL are related by dA = dL/(1 + z)2 for an object at redshift z. [3]
For the luminosity distance, we first need to calculate the area of a sphere of radius r (where r is the comoving proper distance) in the RW metric. This is straightforward: we set dr = dt = 0 and integrate over dΩ, getting 4πx2 where x is defined on the exam cover. Therefore, in a non-expanding universe, we would have f = L/(4πx2). [0.5]
In an expanding universe, however, each photon we receive has had its energy reduced by a factor of (1 + z), from the redshift of its frequency. In addition, the rate of reception of photons per unit time is reduced by another factor of (1 + z). Therefore in fact f = L/(4πx2(1 + z)2).

Comparing this with the above definition, we see that dL = x(1 + z),
[1]
For the angular size distance, we calculate the proper distance between the two edges of the object, assuming it is aligned perpendicular to us. Since it's bound to be a small angle, we don't really need to integrate – we can just write D = a(te)xθ [that's a letter x not a × sign!]. Comparing this with the definition, and writing a(te) = 1/(1 + z), we find that dA = x/(1 + z). [1]
Comparing the expressions for dL and dA gives dL = dA(1 + z)2 as reuired. [0.5]
Does this result rely on assuming that the universe has a flat geometry? [0.5]
No. Nothing we did in the derivation required setting x = r (which is true only in a flat geometry); in fact, the factors of x cancelled out when we considered the ratio.

Note, however, that the expressions dL = dP(1 + z) and dA = dP/(1 + z) do require the universe to have a flat geometry, because in these cases we have set x = r.
[0.5]

(2006 Q4.)

Go on to the next question.

Go back to the lectures page.